Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Make Full Utilization Of Your Articles Source Field
#1
Big Grin 
Today, there is not necessarily anything wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or clients. Such resource boxes will simply benefit their site ratings in a...

I run a report service on my site, and I am seeing an ever-increasing number of articles being submitted, solely for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is most likely due to the growing number of PLR articles and material that is becoming available. Site Preview includes more about the reason for this belief.

Today, there is certainly not something wrong with this, I only believe that authors who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or clients. Such source boxes will only gain their site ratings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.

Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out can be as follows. This fresh LatashiaColleano » Uasdan.com: Îñåòèÿ article has varied stirring warnings for the meaning behind this belief.

Much of the traffic to my post directory comes from search engines, by people searching for information on a specific subject. Now, this user types within their key-words, clicks on the search field, and is given a listing of relevant sites. They selected one, and are taken to the author's article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource box at the conclusion of the article to see what else they have to say on this issue. There, they find a link to a site advertising mobile ringers. May be the reader going to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. They would like to learn about snowboarding, maybe not personalize their phone. In my opinion among three things may happen then:

The audience leaves the whole site in disgust.

The reader clicks on the link to your relevant article.

The reader clicks on a related Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual promotion) ad.

They do not click the author's source link. That is a possible client dropped, very probably permanently.

Yes, put a link in to your website in the resource field, but most article directories allow many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s linked to the article subject as well, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the consumer.

'But my site doesn't have anything related to that issue about it'!

You can add something which does. Put a post directory, and have the resource package saying 'To learn more articles on this subject, go here.' Add a web service, and have the writing say 'To view links to web sites on this subject, just click here.' Or simply visit ClickBank, look for related projects, and have a link to them, with the link saying something like 'If you prefer to find out more on this issue, obtain this product.' Ultimately, not just a direct connect to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one.

By doing this, you still get that url to your website that you were after formerly, but, moreover, you have the chance to generate income from your audience in a fresh way. A win-win situation. Going To webaddress probably provides tips you should use with your mother. Plus, you don't seem like somebody basically distributing acquired content on any subject only for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. I found out about partner site by browsing Bing. An infinitely more professional look. Is not it worth making the effort to make better use of one's resource box?.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Website Auctions | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication